{"id":19546,"date":"2025-03-27T09:24:58","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:24:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/interzero.pl\/?p=19546"},"modified":"2025-03-27T09:24:58","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:24:58","slug":"projekt-rop-pod-fala-krytyki","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/interzero.pl\/en\/blog\/projekt-rop-pod-fala-krytyki\/","title":{"rendered":"Ministerial draft ROP under a wave of criticism from manufacturers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"nowy<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Ministerial draft ROP under a wave of criticism from manufacturers<\/strong><\/span><\/h1><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>

We know the assumptions of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system, which the Ministry of Climate and Environment has been working on for some time. However, the eagerly awaited ROP model differs significantly from what entrepreneurs and environmental experts had expected.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>